Sunday, April 5, 2009

Geithner Speaks, The private sector will set prices. Taxpayers will share in any upside.


The American economy and much of the world now face extraordinary challenges, and confronting these challenges will continue to require extraordinary actions.

No crisis like this has a simple or single cause, but as a nation we borrowed too much and let our financial system take on irresponsible levels of risk. Those decisions have caused enormous suffering, and much of the damage has fallen on ordinary Americans and small-business owners who were careful and responsible. This is fundamentally unfair, and Americans are justifiably angry and frustrated.

The depth of public anger and the gravity of this crisis require that every policy we take be held to the most serious test: whether it gets our financial system back to the business of providing credit to working families and viable businesses, and helps prevent future crises.

Over the past six weeks we have put in place a series of financial initiatives, alongside the Recovery and Reinvestment Program, to help lay the financial foundation for economic recovery. We launched a broad program to stabilize the housing market by encouraging lower mortgage rates and making it easier for millions to refinance and avoid foreclosure. We established a new capital program to provide banks with a safeguard against a deeper recession. By providing confidence that banks will have a sufficient level of capital even if the outlook is worse than expected, more credit will be available to the economy at lower interest rates today -- making it less likely that the more negative economy they fear will take place.


We started a major new lending program with the Federal Reserve targeted at the securitization markets critical for consumer and small business lending. Last week, we announced additional actions to support lending to small businesses by directly purchasing securities backed by Small Business Administration loans.

Together, actions over the last several months by the Federal Reserve and these initiatives by this administration are already starting to make a difference. They have helped to bring mortgage interest rates near historic lows. Just this month, we saw a 30% increase in refinancing of mortgages, which means millions of Americans are taking advantage of the lower rates. This is good for homeowners, and it's good for the economy. The new joint lending program with the Federal Reserve led to almost $9 billion of new securitizations last week, more than in the last four months combined.

However, the financial system as a whole is still working against recovery. Many banks, still burdened by bad lending decisions, are holding back on providing credit. Market prices for many assets held by financial institutions -- so-called legacy assets -- are either uncertain or depressed. With these pressures at work on bank balance sheets, credit remains a scarce commodity, and credit that is available carries a high cost for borrowers.

Today, we are announcing another critical piece of our plan to increase the flow of credit and expand liquidity. Our new Public-Private Investment Program will set up funds to provide a market for the legacy loans and securities that currently burden the financial system.

The Public-Private Investment Program will purchase real-estate related loans from banks and securities from the broader markets. Banks will have the ability to sell pools of loans to dedicated funds, and investors will compete to have the ability to participate in those funds and take advantage of the financing provided by the government.

The funds established under this program will have three essential design features. First, they will use government resources in the form of capital from the Treasury, and financing from the FDIC and Federal Reserve, to mobilize capital from private investors. Second, the Public-Private Investment Program will ensure that private-sector participants share the risks alongside the taxpayer, and that the taxpayer shares in the profits from these investments. These funds will be open to investors of all types, such as pension funds, so that a broad range of Americans can participate.

Third, private-sector purchasers will establish the value of the loans and securities purchased under the program, which will protect the government from overpaying for these assets.

The new Public-Private Investment Program will initially provide financing for $500 billion with the potential to expand up to $1 trillion over time, which is a substantial share of real-estate related assets originated before the recession that are now clogging our financial system. Over time, by providing a market for these assets that does not now exist, this program will help improve asset values, increase lending capacity by banks, and reduce uncertainty about the scale of losses on bank balance sheets. The ability to sell assets to this fund will make it easier for banks to raise private capital, which will accelerate their ability to replace the capital investments provided by the Treasury.

This program to address legacy loans and securities is part of an overall strategy to resolve the crisis as quickly and effectively as possible at least cost to the taxpayer. The Public-Private Investment Program is better for the taxpayer than having the government alone directly purchase the assets from banks that are still operating and assume a larger share of the losses. Our approach shares risk with the private sector, efficiently leverages taxpayer dollars, and deploys private-sector competition to determine market prices for currently illiquid assets. Simply hoping for banks to work these assets off over time risks prolonging the crisis in a repeat of the Japanese experience.

Moving forward, we as a nation must work together to strike the right balance between our need to promote the public trust and using taxpayer money prudently to strengthen the financial system, while also ensuring the trust of those market participants who we need to do their part to get credit flowing to working families and businesses -- large and small -- across this nation.

This requires those in the private sector to remember that government assistance is a privilege, not a right. When financial institutions come to us for direct financial assistance, our government has a responsibility to ensure these funds are deployed to expand the flow of credit to the economy, not to enrich executives or shareholders. These provisions need to be designed and applied in a way that does not deter the participation by the private sector in generally available programs to stabilize the housing markets, jump-start the credit markets, and rid banks of legacy assets.

We cannot solve this crisis without making it possible for investors to take risks. While this crisis was caused by banks taking too much risk, the danger now is that they will take too little. In working with Congress to put in place strong conditions to prevent misuse of taxpayer assistance, we need to be very careful not to discourage those investments the economy needs to recover from recession. The rule of law gives responsible entrepreneurs and investors the confidence to invest and create jobs in our nation. Our nation's commitment to pursue economic policies that promote confidence and stability dates back to the very first secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, who first made it clear that when our government gives its word we mean it.

For all the challenges we face, we still have a diverse and resilient financial system. The process of repair will take time, and progress will be uneven, with periods of stress and fragility. But these policies will work. We have already seen that where our government has provided support and financing, credit is more available at lower costs.

But as we fight the current crisis, we must also start the process of ensuring a crisis like this never happens again. As President Obama has said, we can no longer sustain 21st century markets with 20th century regulations. Our nation deserves better choices than, on one hand, accepting the catastrophic damage caused by a failure like Lehman Brothers, or on the other hand being forced to pour billions of taxpayer dollars into an institution like AIG to protect the economy against that scale of damage. The lack of an appropriate and modern regulatory regime and resolution authority helped cause this crisis, and it will continue to constrain our capacity to address future crises until we put in place fundamental reforms.

Our goal must be a stronger system that can provide the credit necessary for recovery, and that also ensures that we never find ourselves in this type of financial crisis again. We are moving quickly to achieve those goals, and we will keep at it until we have done so.

Mr. Geithner is the U.S. Treasury secretary.

Friday, April 3, 2009

worring is negative goal setting


"Worry is negative goal setting." Goal setting should be positive. Some examples of goal setting are: n To increase the sales turnover by 25% within the next six months. n To write a book on creativity within the next 12 months. n To launch a new product within the next six months. These are specific outcomes which will focus our mind to specific action plans and strategy. We will be able to muster our resources and efforts required to achieve the goals. The raw material for fixing such goals is our enthusiasm and drive. With this frame of mind, we will feel confident and excited. On the other hand, if we are worried, we will not be fixing positive goals, but negative goals. Some examples for negative goals are: n To avoid an accident while driving my new expensive car. n To avoid a confrontation with the aggrieved customer when I meet him next. n To avoid a loss in the business during the next quarter. If you carefully go through the above two sets of goals, you will notice two different sets of patterns. The first set of goals will make us to focus on positive results. The second set of goals is something which we want to avoid and will make us defensive. Positive goals will give us the enthusiasm and drive and trigger us into actions. Negative goals will infuse fear in us. Positive goals will make us to feel confident and excited. Negative goals will make us to feel depressed if we are not able to come out with a suitable strategy to avoid the same. So, we need to redefine what we want from negative to positive. Instead of saying `how to avoid a loss', reframe the same to `how to increase the profit'. Instead of saying `how to avoid an accident', reframe the same to `how to drive carefully'. If we are able to do this slight shift, it will affect our mind set and put us in a resourceful state of mind.

Suzuki Cervo : Maruti's Answer to Tata Nano






Suzuki Cervo : Maruti's Answer to Tata Nano



The battle for the small car is getting hotter. Soon after the Tatas stunned the world with a Rs 1 lakh car, Nano, Hyundai stated its intention to come out with a car that could cost less than Rs 2 lakh and hit the road by 2011. And now, auto biggie Maruti-Suzuki too is ready with Its small car. The little car could hit the road, they say, as early as the end of this year or early 2009. The Suzuki car will come closest to rival Nano. It will sport a Suzuki 660cc engine - as against Nano's 623cc - and wear a tag of around Rs 1.5 lakh on road (that is, excluding insurance) - a little higher than Nano, which is expected to be Rs 1.25 lakh on road. The car might be called 'Suzuki Cervo'. Have a look at some pictures of the Japanese Suzuki Cervo ... Looks Cool...

what really marketing is ?


1. You see a gorgeous girl at a party. You go up to her and say: "I am very rich. Marry me!" - That's Direct Marketing"


2. You're at a party with a bunch of friends and see a gorgeous girl. One of your friends goes up to her and pointing at you says: "He's very rich. "Marry him." -That's Advertising"


3. You see a gorgeous girl at a party. You go up to her and get her telephone number. The next day, you call and say: "Hi, I'm very rich. "Marry me - That's Telemarketing"


4. You're at a party and see gorgeous girl. You get up and straighten your tie, you walk up to her and pour her a drink, you open the door (of the car)for her, pick up her bag after she drops it, offer her ride and then say:"By the way, I'm rich. Will you "Marry Me?" - That's Public Relations"


5. You're at a party and see gorgeous girl. She walks up to you and says:"You are very rich! "Can you marry ! me?" - That's Brand Recognition"


6. You see a gorgeous girl at a party. You go up to her and say: "I am very rich. Marry me!" She gives you a nice hard slap on your face. - "That's Customer Feedback"


7. You see a gorgeous girl at a party. You go up to her and say: "I am very rich. Marry me!" And she introduces you to her husband. - "That's demand and supply gap"


8. You see a gorgeous girl at a party. You go up to her and before you say anything, another person come and tell her: "I'm rich. Will you marry me?" and she goes with him - "That's competition eating into your market share"


9. You see a gorgeous girl at a party. You go up to her and before you say: "I'm rich, Marry me!" your wife arrives. - "That's restriction for entering new markets"

Thursday, April 2, 2009

job and security


Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of men as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is a daring adventure or nothing at all." `How secure are our jobs? How secure is our future? Will I continue to receive my salary next month?' . These are some of the most frequently heard questions these days when the whole world is going through gripping recession and economic slowdown. In my managing change seminars, I start the session by an emphatic statement: there is no permanent job, all jobs are permanently temporary! I used to receive very violent reactions and arguments. But if you calmly think for a while you will realize that nothing existed permanently. Go through the history of large organizations which were doing so well about three decades ago and see if they exist today. Take a look of the old products we were using so well some twenty years ago and notice if they are still in use today. Do you remember the gramophone record and the manual typewriter? There were some jobs and jobs holders which were very important once, like the postman. Did you not eagerly wait for the postman for the important posts he brought once? Do you wait for the postman anymore? What happened to the stenographers and typists? So, security is a myth. What is real is our talents and skill. Our ambition and drive is permanent. Our enthusiasm and willingness to reach out to our goal is permanent. Change is permanent and ongoing. We cannot avoid it. Risk is always there whether we like it or not. There will be obsolescence redundancy. We cannot avoid the same. Life is an adventure whether we like it or not. So, explore yourself the world of opportunity around you. Get excited about the endless possibilities life offers. Believe in the hidden potential inside you. With this frame of mind read the above quotation once again and you will realize why Helen Keller is remembered today

Pune University's PGDBM is a MBA-equivalent degree or not?

A criminal complaint filed by second year students of the Post Graduate Diploma in Management (PGDBM) course at DINA Institute of Hotel and Business Management (DINA), Pune has brought to light certain anomalies present in the PGDBM course offered by private institutes in affiliation with the University of Pune.
Although it sounds deceptively like the MBA-equivalent post-graduate diploma awarded by autonomous institutions such as the Indian institutes of Management (IIMs) or SP Jain Institute of Management and Research, in reality the University of Pune’s PGDBM is not at all at par with a Post Graduate or Master’s degree as commonly recognized in the Indian education system. Why? Because for one, University of Pune’s PGDBM will not enable you to pursue higher doctoral studies. Moreover, this course has relaxed eligibility criteria which even allow a class XII failed student to pursue it.
As of now, senior DINA officials including four members of the family backing the institute have been named in the complaint which charges the officials with the offences of cheating and forgery. The 17 student complainants alleged that the institute officials cheated them by misrepresenting the PGDBM as a fulltime MBA equivalent degree. Reacting to the development, DINA’s Executive Director Ajit Kumar Oberoi along with five other officials (including family members) named in the case filed a plea for anticipatory bail on March 4, 2009, which was rejected by a Pune sessions court on March 23.Apart from DINA, many Pune based management institutes such as MIT School of Management (MITSoM), Suryadutta Institute of Management and Research (SIMR) and Prestige College of Management and Technology too offer the PGDBM course in affiliation with the University of Pune. The University’s official documents do not specify the PGDBM course to be a part time program. Prestige College of Management and Technology specifies the PGDBM course it offers to be a full time program while MITSoM and SIMR list the course as a part time program. DINA has described the PGDBM to be a fulltime program and a degree equivalent to MBA in marketing emails and pamphlets issued by the institute. Several other business schools in and around Pune offer this course in various forms, though none of them are equivalent to an MBA degree.The PGDBM eligibility criteria enable Engineering Diploma holders from a Board of Technical Education of any state or central government to apply to the course. It may be noted that the eligibility criteria for Engineering Diplomas is passing Senior Secondary Certificate (class X), including the ones offered by the Directorates of Technical Education of state governments. In India, a Bachelor’s degree is the minimum eligibility required to apply for a Master’s degree in management.“The two year PGDBM course under the University of Pune is not equivalent to the post graduate diplomas in management provided by institutions such as the IIMs. A graduate of this course cannot enroll for a PhD at the University of Pune,” said a high placed official in the management department of the University. The University specified eligibility requirements for Ph.D state that applicants are required to hold a full-fledged Master’s degree. IIMs too do not accept graduates of a university affiliated PGDBM course for their doctoral program called Fellow Program in Management (FPM). An applicant to this course is required to be a holder of a post graduate degree. Graduates of MBA programs conducted by universities or holders of post graduate diplomas in management from autonomous institutions may apply to the FPM course provided at various IIMs.When asked to clarify on the issue, DINA’s Executive Director Ajit Kumar Oberoi said, “The PGDBM program under University of Pune is equivalent to an MBA in terms of course content, job opportunities and competencies provided. I cannot comment on whether a PGDBM graduate is eligible for a PhD as eligibility criteria vary across institutions. The University allows holders of Bachelor’s degree as well as diplomas from technical institutions to enroll for this course. It appears that the University equates the two.”DINA is also mired in a parallel controversy over the fees charged for PGDBM. While other institutes such as Suryadatta Institute of Management and Information Research, Pune charges Rs 50,000 and Prestige College of Management and Technology charges Rs 40,000 for two years, DINA charges Rs 2.75 lakh for the same duration. This matter was brought up in a University meeting, where as per a Mid-Day Pune report, Mr Oberoi nearly assaulted the university’s Dean of Management Department Mr CM Chitale. As of now, the University’s Vice Chancellor Narendra Jadhav has instituted an enquiry committee to investigate the cheating in fees.

Monday, March 30, 2009

anil ambani







Anil Ambani (born June 4, 1959) is an Indian businessman and Chairman of Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group.


Ambani joined Reliance, the company founded by his late father Dhirubhai Ambani, in 1983 as Co-Chief Executive Officer and is credited with having pioneered many financial innovations in the Indian capital

markets. For example, he led India's first forays into overseas capital markets with international public offerings of global depositary receipts, convertibles and bonds. He directed Reliance in its efforts to raise, since 1991, around US$2 billion from overseas financial markets; with a 100-year Yankee bond issue in January 1997 being the high point, after which people regarded him as a financial wizard[citation needed]. He along with his brother, Mukesh Ambani, has steered the Reliance Group to its current status as India's leading textiles, petroleum, petrochemicals, power, and telecom company.

Anil was the member of Uttar Pradesh Development Council (this council has now been scrapped). He is also the Chairman of Board of Governors of DA-IICT, Gandhinagar and a member of the Board of Governors of the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. He is member of the Board of Governors, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad. He is also a member of the Central Advisory Committee, Central Electricity Regulatory Commission. In June 2004, Anil was elected as an Independent Member of the Rajya Sabha - Upper House, Parliament of India with the support of the Samajwadi Party. In March 2006, he resigned. In 2007 his name was added to the list of Indian Trillionaires (in terms of Indian Rupee).

He has been linked with several starlets in his long career including his current wife of more than 15 years. He is a close friend of movie star Amitabh Bachchan. One of his major achievements in the entertainment industry is the takeover of Adlabs, the movie production to distribution to multiplex company that owns Mumbai's only dome theatre.

He recently topped Business Sheet's "biggest loser" list of business leaders who lost money in the Late 2000s recession [2], losing $32 billion in 2008, which brought him out of the top ten list to number 34 in 2009.

Awards and Recognition

* Voted the 3rd most powerful person in India in the 2009 India Today Power List, in March.
* Voted Businessman of the Year 2006 by Times of India-TNS poll [2]
* Adjudged as the CEO of the Year at the prestigious Platts Global Energy Awards for 2004.
* Voted as 'MTV Youth Icon of the Year for 2003' in September 2003.
* Conferred 'The Entrepreneur of the Decade Award' by the Bombay Management Association, October 2002.
* Awarded the First Wharton Indian Alumni Award by the Wharton India Economic Forum (WIEF) in recognition of his contribution to the establishment of Reliance as a global leader in many of its business areas, December 2001.
* Conferred the ' Businessman of the Year 1997' award by India's leading business magazine Business India, December 1997.